Thanks for the replies. Sounds like the Oregon 300 is holding it's own as far as accuracy. In tough situations like tree cover to, compared to the 60cscx?
Before I commit to the 300, just to throw in a wild card, How does the Delorme PN-40 stack up to the 300? I've seen it mentioned in reviews of the Oregon series, but haven't really looked at it. From what little I've found the pros for it are faster processing, not sure but guessing from the dual processor it advertises. Some have also said that it works with maps, or maybe they're propriatary maps, that look really good. I hadn't paid much attention because in my knoob view point they aren't a mainstream brand, so there will be more support, maps and flexibility with Garmin. Is my logic sound, or should I really look at the PN-40?
Before I commit to the 300, just to throw in a wild card, How does the Delorme PN-40 stack up to the 300? I've seen it mentioned in reviews of the Oregon series, but haven't really looked at it. From what little I've found the pros for it are faster processing, not sure but guessing from the dual processor it advertises. Some have also said that it works with maps, or maybe they're propriatary maps, that look really good. I hadn't paid much attention because in my knoob view point they aren't a mainstream brand, so there will be more support, maps and flexibility with Garmin. Is my logic sound, or should I really look at the PN-40?